Comments on: News Websites Don’t Understand The Web http://www.oldschoolseo.com/2008/11/17/news-websites-dont-understand-the-web/ Anthony Kirlew's Internet Marketing Blog Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:47:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: oldschool http://www.oldschoolseo.com/2008/11/17/news-websites-dont-understand-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-10807 oldschool Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:20:43 +0000 http://www.oldschoolseo.com/2008/11/17/news-websites-dont-understand-the-web/#comment-10807 @ Joe - I was in a hurry when I posted that, but I didn't even touch the fact that they don't get how Social Media works. I guess some do now that they are using Twitter, but many aren't plugged in yet. I guess they just need to buy my new book? :-) @ Joe – I was in a hurry when I posted that, but I didn’t even touch the fact that they don’t get how Social Media works. I guess some do now that they are using Twitter, but many aren’t plugged in yet. I guess they just need to buy my new book? :-)

]]> By: Joe Cheray http://www.oldschoolseo.com/2008/11/17/news-websites-dont-understand-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-10798 Joe Cheray Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:01:43 +0000 http://www.oldschoolseo.com/2008/11/17/news-websites-dont-understand-the-web/#comment-10798 I have had a few experiences like that where I get this great excerpt that leads into what I am hoping is a great article and then once I go to that papers site I am told I need to register to read the rest of the article or to access the article. It is a pain yes and I suppose they do it for a reason, however just like the actual hard copy print version of their publications people do find a way around having to go through a process to access their information. Personally, I don't go back to those sites that require you to register before you can access their information. It is just me I don't want to read this really great article and then not be able to give it the social networking juice that I am sure it would deserve. I would feel weird about sending someone a link to another opt in type link just to gain information. Unless I had an incentive from the publication such as becoming an affiliate for them or something then I would consider it. Then to it would depend on the publication and if it matched my niche. I have had a few experiences like that where I get this great excerpt that leads into what I am hoping is a great article and then once I go to that papers site I am told I need to register to read the rest of the article or to access the article. It is a pain yes and I suppose they do it for a reason, however just like the actual hard copy print version of their publications people do find a way around having to go through a process to access their information.

Personally, I don’t go back to those sites that require you to register before you can access their information. It is just me I don’t want to read this really great article and then not be able to give it the social networking juice that I am sure it would deserve. I would feel weird about sending someone a link to another opt in type link just to gain information. Unless I had an incentive from the publication such as becoming an affiliate for them or something then I would consider it. Then to it would depend on the publication and if it matched my niche.

]]> By: oldschool http://www.oldschoolseo.com/2008/11/17/news-websites-dont-understand-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-10607 oldschool Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:11:24 +0000 http://www.oldschoolseo.com/2008/11/17/news-websites-dont-understand-the-web/#comment-10607 @Glenn - Thanks for your input. I understand some charge such as WSJ.com, but I am not even talking about the ones that charge. I just think it shows that they don't get how information is shared. They would rather have my email address than have me share the link with hundreds or thousands of people through Social Media and that seems to be backwards. I don't care as much if they link out or not, especially if I can't get to the content :-) @Glenn – Thanks for your input. I understand some charge such as WSJ.com, but I am not even talking about the ones that charge. I just think it shows that they don’t get how information is shared. They would rather have my email address than have me share the link with hundreds or thousands of people through Social Media and that seems to be backwards.

I don’t care as much if they link out or not, especially if I can’t get to the content :-)

]]> By: Glenn http://www.oldschoolseo.com/2008/11/17/news-websites-dont-understand-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-10606 Glenn Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:17:02 +0000 http://www.oldschoolseo.com/2008/11/17/news-websites-dont-understand-the-web/#comment-10606 I think newspaper sites are entitled to some compensation for their work. Registering doesn't seem too high a price for the consumer, especially when getting something like the New York Times, which charges $180 a quarter for its print edition nationally. Registered users can email stories to others, usually. But, yeah, it's a pain. I think one way newspapers continue to be clueless about the web is the lack of true useful outgoing links -- most just point to other in-house content. They need to learn from the news and trade blogs that do this so well. I think newspaper sites are entitled to some compensation for their work. Registering doesn’t seem too high a price for the consumer, especially when getting something like the New York Times, which charges $180 a quarter for its print edition nationally. Registered users can email stories to others, usually. But, yeah, it’s a pain. I think one way newspapers continue to be clueless about the web is the lack of true useful outgoing links — most just point to other in-house content. They need to learn from the news and trade blogs that do this so well.

]]>